🔗 Share this article

Nicolas Cage could be the optimal selection for a audacious horror film centered on the biblical figure, though not for the reasons certain audiences may think. In reality, Cage doesn't actually portray Jesus in the new film: the part he plays is listed simply as a craftsman. The actor is framed as a father figure of this story, working to maintain his beliefs as The Boy (played by Noah Jupe), his now-teenage foster child, starts to show miraculous gifts. Why it's hard to envision another leading star taking this character is that even as the figure becomes burdened with various challenges, Nicolas Cage looks practically emotionally confident that this murky, grim small film is worth his time.

Cage's Recent Film Selections

Nicolas Cage has been using those years more selectively lately. He still stars in more films than most average viewers could possibly view — for example, were you informed that the actor has made three distinct cowboy movies over the last few years? — but he also includes esteemed A24/Neon gigs like one recent hit, another notable movie, and Longlegs. This new film seems like in that category, as it’s not strictly scary, potentially provocative, and handles a exaggerated concept with gravity.

Movie's Premise and Execution

Regrettably, writer-director the director fails to repay viewer engagement. The film begins with a compellingly nomadic setting, presented as based on an unknown scripture about the early years of Jesus. The Carpenter, The Mother, and their son relocate constantly, fearful of doctrinal intolerance or distrust over The Boy’s unusual abilities. “Calamity follows us,” Cage mournfully notes. That continues when sinister entities attack the family where they currently live, beginning on the familiar Biblical temptation for The Boy.

Sometimes, the movie resembles an demonic possession-type supernatural thriller, but not one of the central roles are explicitly taken over. On the contrary, they are progressively isolated mutually, as these powers infect a nearby girl (Isla Johnston, credited as “The Stranger”) that the son forms a relationship with, and provides each character disturbing images of a dark tomorrow. The Carpenter in particular grapples with his role in the narrative, at times berating his child who mystifies him.

Discussion and Sensitivity

The subject matter is likely to stir disagreement, and Nathan approaches it with much care — overly, maybe. The notion of a young man facing his future martyrdom and tempted by dark influences is truly frightening, but Nathan may be hesitant regarding looking exploitative and eager to indicate his intentions, so he often retreats into darkly ominous visuals. The figures constantly ponder — FKA Twigs, who demonstrated real promise in the 2024 Crow remake, interestingly — yields her performance to her character's costume, occasionally interrupted by some disturbing frightening scenes.

Cage's Acting and Film's Shortcomings

At the same time, the actor toy with exactly the kind of melodramatic acting that his more snickering appreciators could be expecting. An instance (also included) in the trailer where he erupts and yells “My belief is broken!” When this sort of florid outburst is part of a Jesus-themed horror movie, perhaps a more brazenly silly approach would take better advantage of his eagerness to be extreme as required. On the other hand, The Carpenter’s Son more closely resembles the less successful direct-to-video productions he starred in over the last decade — not the cheesy thrillers but rather the narrative films and supernatural thrillers that typically appear interesting, and frequently include some select memorable scenes, but ultimately feel like, frankly, low-budget DTV material.

Honestly, a number of those, although simpler, were easier to view in general. This is when I need to break my usual practice, not spiritual but career-related: Years back, a beloved editor convinced me to banish words like “monotonous” or “lifeless” from my reviewing language. These phrases convey little but a subjective and broadly stated impatience, avoiding the job of clearly expressing the thoughtful and emotional experience of watching a specific film. It's challenging to convey boredom without appearing dull yourself. It's just as unclear as labeling a movie “engaging.” “Elaborate,” that is.

Yet, I acknowledge, I was bored during much of The Carpenter’s Son. On the positive side, it is a devotional type of stultification, not due to this movie is moralizing, but since it takes a sort of dutiful submission to sit through it. At some point in the beginning, this feature enters a repetitive rhythm of simmering distress, and never really