🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn followers recognizing you as a industry expert? Do numerous commenters praising your advice on growing your business? Are headhunters making contact to discuss collaborations?

Should that not be the case, the explanation could be your gender.

The Experiment: Changing Gender Identity to achieve Better Visibility

Numerous women participated in an organized LinkedIn experiment recently following viral posts suggested that changing their profile gender to "man" boosted their network presence.

Other testers rewrote their professional summaries to incorporate what they termed "bro-coded" language - adding action-focused business buzzwords like "propel", "transform" and "accelerate". Anecdotally, their exposure also improved.

Systemic Preference Concerns Brought Up

The engagement increase has caused some to wonder whether an inherent gender bias in LinkedIn's algorithm prioritizes men who use online business jargon.

Like many large networking sites, LinkedIn employs a computerized system to determine which content are shown to which users - boosting some while suppressing others.

Company Statement

Through a blog post, LinkedIn recognized the trend but claimed it does not factor in "personal characteristics" when deciding content distribution. Rather, the company explained that "numerous factors" affect how content are received.

Modifying profile gender in your settings does not influence how your content shows up in search or feed.

Individual Results

A social media consultant, who modified her pronouns to "male pronouns" and her name to "Simon E", described extraordinary results.

"The statistics I'm seeing indicate a 1,600% increase in profile views and a 1,300% increase in impressions," she noted.

Megan Cornish, a communications strategist, started testing after noticing her audience decrease substantially.

The Process

• Initially, she changed her profile gender to "male"
• Then, she used artificial intelligence to rewrite her professional summary using "masculine-oriented" language
• Lastly, she recycled old posts with similar "agentic" language

The result was instantaneous: a more than fourfold rise in visibility within seven days.

The Downside

Despite the success, Cornish expressed dissatisfaction with the method.

"Before, my content were softer - concise and clever, but also friendly and human," she explained. "Currently, the masculine version was forceful and confident - similar to a white male swaggering around."

She discontinued the experiment after seven days, saying "Every day I persisted, and results got better, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Some testers experienced favorable outcomes. Cass Cooper who modified both her gender to "man" and her race to "white" described a decrease in reach and engagement.

"We understand there's systemic preference, but it's extremely difficult to comprehend how it operates in particular situations or why," she remarked.

Broader Implications

These tests coincide with continuing conversations about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a professional network and social space.

Recent changes in recent months have apparently caused female creators experiencing significantly reduced visibility, leading to informal experiments where identical content by men and women received vastly different reach.

System Details

According to LinkedIn, the network uses artificial intelligence to classify and distribute content based on multiple factors, including what's shared and the user's professional identity.

The company claims it frequently assesses its algorithms, including "checks for inequalities based on gender."

A spokesperson suggested that current reductions in certain members' visibility might stem from increased competition due to more content on the network.

Changing Landscape

As one participant observed, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and refined," she remarked. "This is evolving. It's becoming increasingly aggressive and unpredictable."