🔗 Share this article

Just 48 hours before the NYC mayoral election, Michael Lange issued a significant electoral prediction – going beyond the winner citywide, and precinct by precinct. Lange, an expert in elections who grew up in New York City, has spent more than ten years in left-leaning activism and has become something of a well-known figure this year for his deep dives into municipal statistics and polling.

He released his highly detailed prediction map – accurately predicting that Zohran Mamdani was victorious although missing Andrew Cuomo’s solid showing – on his newsletter, his platform. Lange has a flair for clever terms. He highlighted, as an example, the split between the “commie corridor”, stretching from Park Slope to Bushwick to Astoria, where he forecasted (accurately) that Mamdani would win by huge margins, and the conservative-leaning zone on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. There, “the Free Press and financial newspapers outrank the New York Times” in audience and the majority of electors favored the independent, who ran as a conservative-courting independent.

Voting Day Trends and Surprises

How was your night?

It was necessary because they were adding approximately 200K ballots into the system frequently! I felt a little nervous at the beginning: Mamdani led the initial ballots by 12 points, but there were two big batches of ballots added after that and the advantage went from 12% to 8%. I was worried.

You know, there was a world in which election day turned out somewhat badly for Mamdani, where Cuomo was going to end up basically doubling his votes from the Democratic primary. But the winner gained half a million supporters to his initial base, and that’s a huge reason why he succeeded. He campaigned and massively expanded his support from the first round.

Expanding Support

Where did Mamdani get additional support from?

He assembled the coalition that progressives always wanted to build: diverse racially, youthful, tenants and it’s people squeezed by affordability. He gained considerably with Black and Hispanic voters, everyday New Yorkers, relative to the primary. Plus he boosted his core of left-leaning activists, young leftists, and immigrant groups. Victory required without expanding his appeal.

He built the alliance that the left long aimed for: multiracial, youthful, tenants and people squeezed by affordability

There were also a number of Trump/Mamdani voters – is this significant?

It’s definitely a real thing, confined to Hispanic laborers, Asian communities and Muslims. Electors in immigrant strongholds that went for Trump previously backed the progressive now. But it’s not that he was gaining white working-class voters and Maga voters.

Voter Participation and Effects

One of the big stories of the night was the record participation. Who benefited?

Both sides. Turnout was much greater than anticipated. I figured we might go over two million, but it reached 2.3 million – which is a huge number of participants. There was a decent opposition group, who were motivated, but the Mamdani base was also motivated, and that sufficed to win.

You predicted he’d get over 50% of the vote. Is he likely for that?

Currently it appears he’s favored to surpass half. He’s at just over 50% but there’s still probably 200K ballots left to report as of Wednesday morning. Thus it’s not it’s definitive, but I think it’s likely, and I wish he achieves it so then none can claim the Republican was a disruptor.

GOP Decline

The GOP candidate, the Republican candidate, was another surprise. His vote plummeted.

He didn’t win a single precinct in any borough. Including Tottenville in the borough, similar to an 88% Trump area. That truly surprised me. Cuomo held very white areas, affluent zones and devout communities, and then added many conservatives on Staten Island who had a strong turnout. I believe occurred a lot of tactical voting by GOP voters. This happened before the former president endorsed for Cuomo, but that definitely helped. It could have even turned the tide if the winning alliance hadn’t grown.

Progressive Strongholds

What about your often-discussed “commie corridor” – did backing for the candidate overwhelming in those parts of Brooklyn and Queens?

In my view existed some weakening of the progressive zone in certain places like neighborhoods that have more older white ethnic folks. There, for example, the Greek landlords and residents supported the independent. Thus there was a little resistance. However overall, largely the leftist base is a key factor why Zohran prevailed – he scored between high percentages in specific neighborhoods.

Community Support

Prior to the election there was coverage on whether the candidate was gaining ground with the community. Is there any suggestion that he did?

Exist neighborhoods with many non-religious and left-inclined voters – like Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he did well. However in the wealthy Jewish communities like the Upper East Side, his Middle East stance was influential in those places. Likewise in the moderate communities including Queens neighborhoods, or Bronx areas – they favored the independent. Plus, you have newcomers from the former Soviet Union in the borough, they were strongly supportive. So I don’t know if there were crazy narrative-busters here, but Mamdani did hold left-leaning areas and even parts of the Upper West Side by big margins.

Political Impact

Has Mamdani rewritten what New York represents in politics? Will the progressive base become a launch pad for progressive contenders?

Yes, it’s no coincidence that key political leaders from progressives come from a few areas in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I believe that we’ll see more of that – people will come from these neighborhoods to be promoted to higher office.

But I think that each urban center in America can have their own commie corridor. Cities are the centers of leftwing power in the nation – because they’re young, tenancy is common and they represent locales where individuals struggle by the disparities we face.